Monday, June 6, 2016

Explaining and Comparing the Different Types of Surrogacy


For many couples struggling to conceive, the option of surrogacy is one viable alternative that makes them utterly grateful. There are still a lot of contentions regarding its practice in certain places, but whatever those concerns may be, the fact remains that the science behind—and the positive effect of being able to help couples become parents—is undeniable.

Types of Surrogacy


Couples considering getting surrogacy can choose between two types: traditional or gestational. The traditional type basically has the surrogate mother actively participating in the process of fertilization by donating her own egg. This egg will then be artificially inseminated with the sperm donor, upon which she will then also be the one to carry the fertilized egg in her body throughout the pregnancy.


The gestational type, on the other hand, undergoes the process of in vitro fertilization instead. Here, she will be implanted with an already fertilized egg, combined from both the egg and sperm of the biological parents. She will then carry the baby full term, providing it a healthy environment in the womb, and then afterwards hand over the newborn to its rightful biological parents.


Which Works Better


Essentially, the question of which surrogacy model works better will ultimately depend on what the needs of the would-be parents are. For those who cannot even fertilize an egg, the traditional type could work best for the couple. On the other hand, for those who cannot risk carrying a baby to full term—possibly because of the mother’s own health conditions or complications—the gestational option should be the better option.


Whichever their option would be, what’s most important is they get the right kind of support from their family and friends, especially in this precious time when they are finally having the family they’ve always dreamed of.




Sources:

Surrogacy Overview. HowStuffWorks: Health.
Using a Surrogate Mother: What You Need to Know. WebMD.

No comments:

Post a Comment